I am Oleksandr Filyuk, 15+ years in product UX and 130+ shipped projects. I dissect your site or app via JTBD, AARRR and HEART, document critical issues, and deliver a RICE/ICE prioritized roadmap for Podillia businesses.
Fill out a short form or message me — tell me about your product and its challenges
We'll discuss goals, metrics, and audit scope — you'll get a clear action plan
Full audit with specific recommendations, prioritization, and an implementation roadmap
I conduct comprehensive usability analysis from multiple perspectives
Expert interface evaluation based on Nielsen's 10 heuristics. I identify systemic usability issues that prevent users from achieving their goals.
Conversion funnel analysis and identification of user drop-off points. I provide specific recommendations to increase conversion at every stage.
Detailed mobile experience review: responsiveness, speed, navigation convenience, and touch interaction quality.
Comparative UX analysis of your product against key competitors. I identify strengths and opportunities for differentiation.
Deep user behavior analysis based on analytics data, heatmaps, and session recordings. I uncover real interaction patterns.
WCAG 2.1 compliance review. I ensure your interface is accessible to people with disabilities.
We discuss business goals, target audience, and current issues. I gain access to analytics and other data sources.
I conduct a detailed interface analysis using Nielsen's heuristics and other UX principles, documenting every finding.
I research analytics, heatmaps, session recordings, and conversion funnels to uncover real behavior patterns.
I compare UX solutions with key competitors, identify best practices and improvement opportunities.
I prioritize findings by impact and implementation complexity, creating detailed recommendations with mockups.
I present the audit results with a detailed report, improvement roadmap, and answer all questions.
Choose the optimal package for your project
One-time 2-hour session
$300$400What's included:
Comprehensive analysis in 1 week
$800$1000What's included:
1 month collaboration
$2000$2500What's included:
Answers to the most popular questions
Comparison with other options
| Me | Other consultants | |
|---|---|---|
| Analysis depth | JTBD + AARRR + HEART + RICE | 10-point Nielsen checklist |
| Data | GA4, Hotjar, Mixpanel, Amplitude | Interface screenshots only |
| Business linkage | P&L, LTV/CAC, churn, MRR/ARR | Visual layer only |
| Output | Backlog with A/B test hypotheses | PDF without priorities |
| Timeline | 10-14 days with demo session | 1-2 months, no follow-up |
| Experience | 15+ years, 130+ projects | 2-3 years freelancing |
Khmelnytskyi, with around 270,000 residents and a strong economic cluster around the "7th Kilometer" wholesale market, instrument-making and food industry, is a city where digital products quickly stop being mere "business cards". If your B2B portal serves hundreds of procurement managers daily, every second in the funnel converts into hryvnias. As Oleksandr Filyuk with 15+ years in product UX and 130+ shipped projects, I see the typical picture: owners invest in traffic and ads but lose 40-60% of potential conversion to trivial UX errors. A UX audit is not "make it pretty" — it is an engineering procedure that returns money to P&L which has already been spent on user acquisition.
I work with Podillia companies from Proskurivska to Kamianetska, from KhNU startups to second-generation family textile manufacturers. The approach is universal: business context first (MRR/ARR, churn, LTV/CAC), then behavioral analytics in GA4, Hotjar, Mixpanel or Amplitude, then Nielsen heuristics and WCAG 2.2, finally RICE and ICE prioritization. No abstract advice. Every finding has a quantitative impact estimate on the North Star Metric and ties to a specific JTBD of your ICP.
Layer 1. Business context and metrics. Before looking at the interface, I clarify unit economics. CAC, LTV, conversion funnel, churn, activation definition. Without these numbers any UX recommendation is guesswork. I often hear from Khmelnytskyi clients: "we just have few sales". After 2-3 hours of conversation it turns out the problem is not traffic, but a 73% drop between cart and payment. You receive this diagnosis before UX analysis even begins.
Layer 2. Behavioral analytics. I plug into GA4, validate event correctness, build AARRR funnels (Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Revenue, Referral). If Hotjar or Microsoft Clarity exists, I review session recordings and heatmaps. For product cases I use Mixpanel or Amplitude: retention cohorts, feature adoption, time to first value. This layer answers the key question: where exactly in the funnel the loss happens and how it correlates with ICP segments.
Classic Nielsen 10 heuristics are just the start. I evaluate the product against Google's HEART (Happiness, Engagement, Adoption, Retention, Task success), Cognitive Load principles (Sweller), and WCAG 2.2 level AA. Forms get a separate audit: field types, validation, error messages, autofill, progressive disclosure. For Khmelnytskyi businesses serving Podillia agriculture, forms are critical: an agronomist on a tablet in the field should not type 12 fields manually. Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) are checked separately. Sites loading slower than 3 seconds lose up to 40% of mobile traffic — a foundation without which any UX is secondary.
Accessibility deserves its own focus. Podillia has a significant share of 50+ users, especially in "7th Kilometer" wholesale and small agribusiness segments. If text contrast is below 4.5:1, target buttons smaller than 44×44 px, and search does not work without a mouse — you lose this audience instantly. I document every violation with a WCAG reference and fix priority.
The biggest mistake of a typical audit is a list of 150 recommendations without priorities. The dev team opens such a report, gives up, and does nothing. So I always close the audit with a RICE table: Reach × Impact × Confidence / Effort. Reach is computed from GA4 — how many users hit the issue monthly. Impact is the expected conversion lift backed by niche benchmarks. Confidence reflects how sure we are (A/B-tested = 100%, heuristic = 50-70%). Effort is dev estimate in person-days. Output: a backlog of 15-25 hypotheses sorted by RICE score. Top-5 ships next sprint. The rest is a quarterly map.
Every hypothesis is A/B-test ready: I phrase it as "if we do X for segment Y, metric Z will move by N percent because…". This lets your PM launch experiments via GA4 Experiments, VWO or Optimizely without extra prep.
Universal UX recommendations do not exist. What works in Kyiv or Lviv may flop in Khmelnytskyi because the ICP differs. A wholesale buyer at "7th Kilometer" is a 35-50 year-old manager buying textiles in batches, juggling 5-7 suppliers and needing bulk-order Excel imports. The classic e-commerce "pick size, pick color" funnel stops them. For such ICPs I rebuild architecture: SKU matrices instead of cards, quick-edit price lists, 1C or BAS integrations.
For Podillia agritech the focus shifts: offline mode, voice input, weather API and field IoT integrations. For Proskurivska and Kamianetska retailers — mobile optimization for pedestrian traffic, click-and-collect, precise pickup geolocation. Khmelnytskyi IT Cluster and KhNU/PDU graduates provide enough engineering capacity, but without proper UX diagnostics this capacity scatters. If you need not just an audit but implementation support, we move to /services/business-consulting or the local package /locations/khmelnytskyi/business-consulting, where I lead the team toward PMF and measurable ROI.